Cookie policy: This site uses cookies (small files stored on your computer) to simplify and improve your experience of this website. Cookies are small text files stored on the device you are using to access this website. For more information on how we use and manage cookies please take a look at our privacy and cookie policies. Some parts of the site may not work properly if you choose not to accept cookies.

sections

Microsoft removes the diesel generator

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save

Microsoft is designing many of the traditional engineering elements of the data center out of the equation in its quest for simplicity, including the backup generator.

In its move towards the software resilient cloud data center, it has stripped away the building, leaving modules sitting outside in its latest facility in Boyton Virginia powered only by the grid. And it is not the only facility running without diesel protection. It has taken the same approach in Chicago and Quincy.

“There are tens of megawatts in this data center and other data centers Microsoft runs. They do not have diesel generators behind them,” GFS Microsoft Director of Data Center Architecture & Design Management David Gauthier said.

“We did a lot of looking at our grid that we connected into -  its reliability and what the grid is looking like - and then decided if there is a way we can take advantage of that.

“Many people say that’s your backup, what are you doing? In our Chicago data cener we actually had a couple of good blips that dropped megawatts of load. The application keeps on humming. The user gets redirected to another data center and we bring facility back up online everything hunky dory and we move on.”

Gauthier said Microsoft has removed the cost associated with maintenance and repair of the generator, and the current footprint.

Essentially, the data centers work as part of a virtual cycle – workloads can easily be provisioned to other Microsoft cloud data centers.

The Boyton facility uses modular containers, similar to its Chicago facility, which Gauthier said was just one part of the evolution of Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure.

“In Chicago the containers sit inside a big warehouse – it’s nice, it’s comfortable, it’s easy to operate and it’s a learning experience for us about how these things operate inside. It is about getting our operations people comfortable with it,” Gauthier said.

But after learning in Chicago, where Microsoft opened a modular facility in 2009, Gauthier said it was time to move the containers outside, and now lessons learned from Boyton will hopefully prove to Gauthier and his team that even more can be removed in future modular builds.

 “We are already learning things from this design,” Gauthier said. “Because software is resilient, it can evolve, it can change and evolve which means the data center will change, and become lower cost.”

Gauthier said this is made possible by thinking about the full stack.

“We treat the whole container space and applications as one converged system, so the application that runs inside of these is also our building management system, fire system. It is all managed as one operating application,” Gauthier said.

Chicago was Microsoft’s first software resilient data center, Gauthier said. It was designed so that the whole data center could go off the grid and keep carrying the load its containers supported.

“The container is the failure building—basically it is a container-sized computer,” Gauthier said.

The approach has also removed one of the biggest risks in the data center – human intervention.

“There is a tonne of complexity in having resiliency. There are so many ways to wrap these PDUs (power distribution units) etc around the building but in doing that we were making a lot of human errors,” Gauthier said.

“So we started to look at taking out some of that capability. It has been good for us and it’s kind of what we call ‘fail small’. We are able to really compartmentalize the failure.

“Cloud environments don’t deal well with mixed mode failures. Binary failures, losing all ten racks, are much better than losing one rack. This is harder to deal with from a software standpoint.”

You can read more about Microsoft’s ‘Fail Small’ approach here.

 

Related images

  • Microsoft's David Gauthier

Have your say

Please view our terms and conditions before submitting your comment.

required
required
required
required
required
  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save

Webinars

  • Is Hyperconvergence a Viable Alternative to the Public Cloud?

    Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:00:00

    Enterprise IT leaders are right to be skeptical of such bold claims. After all, is it really possible to deliver an on-premises infrastructure that delivers the same agility, elasticity, and cost-effectiveness of public cloud providers like Amazon Web Services? If you’re following the traditional IT model, with its many siloes and best-of-breed point solutions, the answer is, most likely, no. To truly deliver a viable alternative to public cloud, you need to look beyond traditional IT. Join Evaluator Group and SimpliVity to learn more about how hyperconverged infrastructure can deliver the efficiency, elasticity, and agility of public cloud."

  • "Single Pane of Glass” comes to your Datacenter facility & IT operations

    Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:00:00

    Join Hewlett Packard Enterprise and RoviSys,as well as OSIsoft, for a webinar hosted by DatacenterDynamics’ CTO Stephen Worn, as they discuss the implementation of the “Single Pane of Glass” solution and some of its resulting benefits: •An estimated 10 Million kWh saved in the first full year of operation •Ability to easily meet “Best-Practices” throughout data center operations

  • Overhead Power Distribution – Best Practice in Modular Design

    Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:00:00

    Overhead power distribution in your data center offers many attractive possibilities, but is not without its challenges. Join Starline's Director of Marketing, Mark Swift; CPI’s Senior Data Center Consultant, Steve Bornfield; and University of Florida's Joe Keena for an exploration of the options and some of the pitfalls, supported by real-life examples from the field.

  • White Space 29: See the diagram

    Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:40:00

    Peter is investigating DevOps, Bill looks at security while Max is stuck on the infrastructure level

  • White Space 28: The good, the bad and the ugly

    Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:10:00

    Join the DCD team again this week, as they discuss AMD's ARM based efforts, waste heat, BT's EU deal and cloud for Canucks and much more! Enjoy.

More link